Alonso v. Barham et al
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Alonso
Defendant: Julie Barham and Children, Youth and Families Department
Case Number: 2:2016cv00903
Filed: August 8, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Las Cruces Office
County: Chaves
Presiding Judge: Martha Vazquez
Presiding Judge: Stephan M. Vidmar
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 84 FINAL ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The Court has adopted the 80 Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition to dismiss this action without prejudice for lack of prosecution. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (ve)
November 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 80 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to DISMISS this action without prejudice. Objections to PF&RD due by November 30, 2020. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mail to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D), (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c). (rcf)
September 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 77 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Plaintiff's Show-Cause Response is due no later than October 26, 2020. (am)
July 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 51 STATUS REPORT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Counsel for Defendant Barham must file a status report no later than July 31, 2019. (am)
February 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 41 Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay. Plaintiff may again move to lift the stay after the state-court hearing on Defendant Barham's competency occurs. (jcm)
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 STATUS REPORT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Counsel for Defendant Barham must file a status report no later than February 21, 2019. (jcm)
November 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 STATUS REPORT ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Counsel for Defendant Barham must file a status report no later than December 31, 2018. (am)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alonso v. Barham et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Juan Carlos Alonso
Represented By: Charles C. Currier
Represented By: Frank B Patterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julie Barham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Children, Youth and Families Department
Represented By: Barbara Evans
Represented By: Bryan D Evans
Represented By: Carla Neusch Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?