Ramirez v. Tafoya-Lucero, et al.
Irvin Rodolfo Ramirez |
Alisha Tafoya-Lucero and Attorney General State of New Mexico |
2:2017cv00579 |
May 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Las Cruces Office |
Dona Ana |
Robert A. Junell |
Kevin R. Sweazea |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER by Senior District Judge James A. Parker OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION; adopting in part Report and Recommendations 21 denying Plaintiff's 23 Motion to Stay Petition and hold in abeyance and dismissing this action without prejudice. (bap) |
Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea re 1 & 7 Petition & Amended Petition for 2254 Relief filed by Irvin Rodolfo Ramirez. Objections to R&R due by 7/17/2018. Add 3 days to the deadline if service is by mailing it to the person's last known address (or means described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(D) and (F)); if service is by electronic means, no additional days are added. (Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d); Fed. R. Crim. P. 45(c).) (cbf) |
Filing 14 ORDER TO ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. (sls) |
Filing 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Show Cause Response due by 8/31/2017. (sls) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER to Cure Defects by 6/26/2017. by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. (cbf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.