People for Pearce et al v. Oliver et al
| People for Pearce and Steve E. Pearce |
| Maggie T. Oliver, Hector H. Balderas, Jr. and Dianna Luce |
| 2:2017cv00752 |
| July 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Las Cruces Office |
| Lea |
| Judith C. Herrera |
| Stephan M. Vidmar |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera DENYING 26 Defendant Balderas's Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim, Lack of Standing, and Immunity, DENYING 36 Defendant Oliver's Motion to Dismiss Claims against the Secretary of State in her Individual Capacity and Claims for Injunctive Relief, STRIKING reference to individual capacity claims in the caption, and GRANTING 16 Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Parties are to file a joint submission that contains their stipulations or respective positions on following an expedited discovery and briefing schedule within fourteen days of the entry of this Memorandum Opinion and Order. (baw)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING 13 Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Serve a Responsive Pleading to the Complaint. Defendants' responsive pleadings are due no later than September 19, 2017, at 5:00 p.m. (sg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
