Derrick et al v. Standard Nutrition Company et al
Plaintiff: Ronny Derrick and Angie Derrick
Defendant: Standard Nutrition Company, John Does and XYZ Corporate or Business Entities
Counter_claimant: Standard Nutrition Company
Counter_defendant: Angie Derrick and Ronny Derrick
Case Number: 2:2017cv01245
Filed: December 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Las Cruces Office
County: Eddy
Presiding Judge: Kevin R. Sweazea
Presiding Judge: Stephan M. Vidmar
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury- Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 128 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack GRANTING AS UNOPPOSED 115 First MOTION in Limine , DENYING 119 First MOTION for Reconsideration re 113 Memorandum Opinion and Order and 104 Order on Motion for Sa nctions, GRANTING 120 MOTION for Supplement Exhibits to Document 119, Motion for Reconsideration, and DENYING AS MOOT 123 MOTION to Strike 119 First MOTION for Reconsideration re 113 Memorandum Opinion and Order, 104 Order on Motion for Sanctions It is Further Ordered that the Final Pretrial Conference is currently Vacated and Rescheduled for Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 8:45 a.m. (jjs)
May 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 113 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack granting in part 58 First MOTION for Summary Judgment and denying 73 First MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment and granting in part 106 First MOTION to Exclude Expert Testimony of Dr Ronald Box (jn)
April 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 104 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 68 Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions. (jcm)
February 4, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING a Settlement Conference for June 24, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in a courtroom to-be-determined in Albuquerque. (jcm)
October 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 66 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar DENYING 55 Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension and DENYING 65 Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order. (jcm)
October 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING Oral Argument on 55 Motion to Extend for October 19, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's Meet Me Line at 505-348-2357 to connect to the proceedings. (jcm)
June 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 29 Defendant's Motion to Compel. (sg)
June 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar (am)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Derrick et al v. Standard Nutrition Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Standard Nutrition Company
Represented By: Gregory L. Biehler
Represented By: Luke W Ragsdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: XYZ Corporate or Business Entities
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronny Derrick
Represented By: Laurence M. Berlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Angie Derrick
Represented By: Laurence M. Berlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Standard Nutrition Company
Represented By: Gregory L. Biehler
Represented By: Luke W Ragsdale
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Angie Derrick
Represented By: Laurence M. Berlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Ronny Derrick
Represented By: Laurence M. Berlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?