Lusk v. Jablonski
Plaintiff: Ronald Lusk
Defendant: David Jablonski
Case Number: 2:2018cv00105
Filed: February 1, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Office: Las Cruces Office
County: Otero
Presiding Judge: Laura Fashing
Presiding Judge: Judith C. Herrera
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Judith C. Herrera dismissing Plaintiff's Civil Rights Complaint 1 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. This dismissal is without prejudice to a petition for habeas corpus relief by Plaintiff Lusk. (baw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lusk v. Jablonski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ronald Lusk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Jablonski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?