Gariepy et al v. Geico General Insurance Company
| Sharla G Tucker, Callie Gariepy and Cody Z Tucker |
| Geico General Insurance Company |
| 2:2018cv00695 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Las Cruces Office |
| Chaves |
| Carmen E Garza |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Joint Motion to Stay Proceedings for 90 days, and vacating the 9/25/18 Rule 16 Scheduling Conference by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. (atc)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION to Stay by Geico General Insurance Company. (Keller, Courtenay) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed by September 14, 2018. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh) |
| Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. The Joint Status Report is due by 9/18/2018. A Telephonic Rule 16(c) Hearing is set for 9/25/2018 at 02:00 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. [Parties shall call Judge Garza's Meet Me line at 505.348.2693 to be connected to the proceedings.] Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 9/14/2018. (jrt) |
| Filing 3 GEICO'S ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Geico General Insurance Company. (Keller, Courtenay) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by GEICO General Insurance Company from Fifth Judicial District Court, case number D-0504-CV-2018-00679. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by GEICO General Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Keller, Courtenay) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-5930380 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by GEICO General Insurance Company (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Keller, Courtenay) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (ln) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces) (Chaves County). (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
