Hawkins v. United States Air Force
Clara P Hawkins |
United States Air Force |
2:2018cv00778 |
August 14, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Las Cruces Office |
Curry |
Carmen E Garza |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Personal Injury: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clara P Hawkins. Summons returned executed on 8/21/18 and answer due on 10/20/2018 (Lindsey, Daniel) |
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clara P Hawkins. Summons returned executed to United States Attorney General/Jeff Sessions on 8/21/18 and answer due on 10/20/2018 (Lindsey, Daniel) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clara P Hawkins. Summons executed on 8/20/18 to United States Air Force/Heather Wilson and answer due on 10/19/18 (Lindsey, Daniel) |
Filing 11 FILED IN ERROR - AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Secretary of the Air Force on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Lindsey, Daniel) Modified text on 8/21/2018 (vh). |
Filing 10 FILED IN ERROR - AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on U. S. Attorney General on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Lindsey, Daniel) Modified text on 8/21/2018 (vh). |
Filing 9 FILED IN ERROR - AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on U.S. Attorney for New Mexico on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Lindsey, Daniel) Modified text on 8/21/2018 (vh). |
Filing 8 FILED IN ERROR - SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clara P Hawkins. United States Air Force served on 8/16/2018, answer due 10/15/2018. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Summons Returned Executed)(Lindsey, Daniel) Modified text on 8/21/2018 (vh). |
Filing 7 ** FILED IN ERROR** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit Proof of Service by Plaintiff served on U. S. Attorney General on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Lindsey, Daniel) Modified on 8/20/2018 Atty will refile per call oh Help Desk (meq). |
Filing 6 ** FILED IN ERROR** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Plaintiff Affidavit Proof of Service by Plaintiff served on U. S. Attorney General on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Lindsey, Daniel) Modified on 8/20/2018 Atty will refile per call on Help Desk (meq). |
Filing 5 **FILED IN ERROR** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit Proof of Service by Plaintiff served on Secretary of the Air Force on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Lindsey, Daniel) Modified on 8/20/2018 Atty will refile per call on Help Desk (meq). |
Filing 4 **FILED IN ERROR** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Affidavit Proof of Service by Plaintiff served on U. S. Attorney General on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Lindsey, Daniel) Modified on 8/20/2018 Atty will refile per call on Help desk (meq). |
Filing 3 **FILED IN ERROR** AFFIDAVIT of Service for Proof of Service by Plaintiff served on U.S. Attorney for New Mexico on August 16, 2018, filed by Clara P Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Lindsey, Daniel) Modified on 8/20/2018 Atty will refile (meq). |
Summons Issued as to U.S. Air Force, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (mnb) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (mnb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR CIVIL CASE ALLEGING NEGLIGENCE against UNITED STATES AIR FORCE ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Clara Hawkins. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lindsey, Daniel) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-5971405 re #1 Complaint filed by Clara Hawkins (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Lindsey, Daniel) |
Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza and Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (mnb) |
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (mnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hawkins v. United States Air Force | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Clara P Hawkins | |
Represented By: | Daniel R. Lindsey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Air Force | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.