Esparza v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP
Lisa M. Esparza |
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP |
2:2018cv01037 |
November 7, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Stephan M Vidmar |
Gregory B Wormuth |
Personal Injury: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING telephonic Status Conference for January 7, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. (jcm) |
Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Lisa M. Esparza voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Loren, James)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Lisa M. Esparza.(Enriquez, Laura) |
Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Stores East, LP. (ln) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wal-Mart Stores East, LP., a Delaware Limited Partnership a/k/a and/or d/b/a Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Lisa M. Esparza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Loren, James) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6122910 re #1 Complaint filed by Lisa M. Esparza (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Loren, James) |
United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Esparza v. Wal-Mart Stores East LP | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Wal-Mart Stores East, LP | |
Represented By: | Laura Enriquez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Lisa M. Esparza | |
Represented By: | James M. Loren |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.