Rodriguez-Torres v. USA
Cirilo Rodriguez-Torres |
USA |
2:2018cv01083 |
November 19, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Carmen E Garza |
Tucker L Melancon |
Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Clerk's Minutes for proceedings held before District Judge Tucker L. Melancon: Motion Hearing held on 12/20/2018 re #1 MOTION to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Cirilo Rodriguez-Torres. (Recording Info: ABQ-Chama) (kdh) |
Filing 11 JUDGMENT by District Judge Tucker L. Melancon. (kdh) |
Filing 10 ORDER by District Judge Tucker L. Melancon denying #1 MOTION to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 and denying as moot #8 Motion to Enforce Collateral-Attack Waiver Provision in Plea Agreement and To Dismiss Defendant's Motion to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C Section 2255. (kdh) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Waiver of Appearance by Cirilo Rodriguez-Torres. (kdh) |
Filing 8 Motion to Enforce Collateral-Attack Waiver Provision in Plea Agreement and To Dismiss Defendant's Motion to Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C Section 2255 re #2 Order to Answer, #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) filed by USA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Change of Plea transcript, #2 Exhibit Sentencing transcript) (Fontanez, Eva) Modified text on 12/20/2018 (kg). |
Filing 7 ORDER by District Judge Tucker L. Melancon DENYING #3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Petition to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255. Motion Hearing set for 12/20/2018 at 02:30 PM in Albuquerque - 480 Chama Courtroom before District Judge Tucker L. Melancon. (kg) |
Filing 6 REPLY to Response to Motion re #3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Petition to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by USA. (Fontanez, Eva) |
Filing 5 RESPONSE in Opposition re #3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Petition to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 filed by Cirilo Rodriguez-Torres. (Lavin, Amanda) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Eva Mae Fontanez on behalf of USA (Fontanez, Eva) |
Filing 3 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Defendants Petition to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 by USA. (Fontanez, Eva) |
Filing 2 ORDER TO ANSWER by District Judge Tucker L. Melancon. (kdh) |
United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (jg) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion to Correct Sentence, filed by Cirilo Rodriguez-Torres. (Lavin, Amanda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rodriguez-Torres v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Eva Mae Fontanez |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Cirilo Rodriguez-Torres | |
Represented By: | Amanda R. Lavin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.