Big Chief Plant Services, LLC v. Panhandle Maintenance, LLC
Big Chief Plant Services, LLC |
3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC |
Panhandle Maintenance, LLC |
2:2018cv01226 |
December 27, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Carmen E Garza |
Stephan M Vidmar |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC re Initial Disclosures (Williams, Lucas) |
Filing 24 DECLARATION of Lucas M. Williams in Support of Attorneys' Fees and Costs by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC (Williams, Lucas) |
Filing 23 AMENDED ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. The #19 Initial Scheduling Order is amended only as to the date of the Rule 16 Telephonic Scheduling Conference. The Rule 16 Telephonic Scheduling Conference is set for 3/18/2019 at 03:00 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. [Parties shall call Judge Garza's AT&T Teleconference line at (877) 810-9415, follow the prompts, and enter access code 7467959, to be connected to the proceedings.] (ag) |
Filing 22 NOTICE by 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC re 21 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District,, Certificate of Good Standing for Tyler L. Weidlich (Domas, Stephen) |
Association Dues Received: $ 100 receipt number 1084-6273171 re: # 21 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District,, filed by 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Domas, Stephen) |
Filing 21 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for ThirdParty Defendant 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC, Counter Defendant 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC, Defendant 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC by Stephen Domas on behalf of: Tyler L. Weidlich Beatty & Wozniak, P.C. 216 16th Street, Suite 1100Denver, CO 80202 303-407-4499 tweidlich@bwenergylaw.com (Association Dues - Online Payment) (Domas, Stephen)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
![]() |
Filing 19 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. Joint Status Report is due by 3/6/2019. A Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 3/14/2019 at 02:30 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. [Parties shall call Judge Garza's AT&T Teleconference line at (877) 810-9415, follow the prompts, and enter access code 7467959, to be connected to the proceedings.] (ag) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Cancel Lien by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Response to Motion to cancel lien, #2 Reply to Motion to cancel lien) [Documents originally filed as attachments to DEFENDANT'S FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL {Doc 8} and NOTICE OF REMOVAL {Doc 1}] (rh) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 10 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Panhandle Maintenance, LLC, 16 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC & 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge filed by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (rh) |
Filing 16 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Domas, Stephen)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephen Domas on behalf of 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC (Domas, Stephen) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Panhandle Maintenance, LLC as to 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC. (Queener, Richard) |
![]() |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION to Extend (other) Time to Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC. (Williams, Lucas) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #3 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal),, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC.(Williams, Lucas) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Panhandle Maintenance, LLC voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Queener, Richard)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed within 10 DAYS. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh) |
Filing 8 DEFENDANT'S FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL against 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC., filed by Panhandle Maintenance, LLC. (Queener, Richard) Modified on 1/14/2019 (rh). |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC (Williams, Lucas) |
![]() |
Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Big Chief Plant Services, LLC voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Williams, Lucas)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Big Chief Plant Services, LLC of Completion of Briefing on Motion to Cancel Lien (Williams, Lucas) |
Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , First THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC, First COUNTERCLAIM Big Chief Plant Services, LLC against 3 Bear Delaware Operating-NM, LLC by Panhandle Maintenance, LLC. (Queener, Richard) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kdh) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Panhandle Maintenance, LLC from Fifth Judicial District Court, case number D-0506-CV-201801957. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Panhandle Maintenance, LLC. (Queener, Richard) |
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 5 (Roswell) to 2 (Las Cruces). (kdh) |
Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (kdh) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6200861 re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Panhandle Maintenance, LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Queener, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.