Fawley v. Lea County Correctional Facility et al
Benjamin W Fawley |
FNU Pena, Jane or John 1-10 Doe, German Franco, R. C. Smith, D Burris, David Jablonski, Dwight Sims, GEO Group, Inc., Lea County Correctional Facility and Jane/John Doe |
2:2019cv00079 |
January 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kenneth J Gonzales |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION To Present Documentary Evidence by Benjamin W Fawley. (jjs) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Benjamin W Fawley. (jn) |
Filing 3 MOTION Seeking production of court records or legal access to court records to the initial civil rights complaint and appeal from case Brady v. Tansy, 1993 U.S. Lexic 33697 (10th Cir 21 Dec. 1993) by Benjamin W Fawley. (yc) |
Filing 2 Filing fee: $ 400.00, receipt number ALB042587 re #1 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Benjamin W Fawley. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment)(mnb) filed by Benjamin W Fawley (mnb)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 1 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Benjamin W Fawley. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(mnb) |
District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales and Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (mnb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.