Moore v. City of Clovis et al
| 2:2019cv00366 |
| May 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Las Cruces Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER by District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales granting 40 Joint Motion to Dismiss Individual Defendants. Louis Riddle, Diane Calbert and James Gurule terminated. (tah)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea GRANTING 35 Motion to Vacate Scheduling Order; and setting deadline for filing closing documents. Closing documents due to Presiding Judge on or before November 2, 2019. (cbf)
|
|
Filing
5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Telephonic Rule 16(c) Hearing set for June 19, 2019 at 10:00 AM. Joint Status Report due by May 28, 2019. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than May 28, 2019. (cbf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moore v. City of Clovis et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
