Lehmann v. Patterson-UTI
| Thomas Lehmann |
| Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC and Patterson-UTI |
| 2:2019cv00530 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Personal Injury: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Joint Status Report is due by September 6, 2019. A telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for September 27, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 8/16/2019. (jcm)
|
| Filing 7 Clerk's Minutes for telephonic status conference held before Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar on July 26, 2019. (Recording Info: Liberty) (jcm) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING telephonic Status Conference for July 26, 2019, at 9:30 a.m. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. (jcm)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Patterson-UTI re #4 Memorandum Opinion and Order Amended Notice of Removal to United States District Court for the District of New Mexico (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Junker, Lawrence) |
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Defendant is granted leave to amend #1 its Notice of Removal no later than July 10, 2019. (am)
|
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (khs) |
| Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (khs) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (khs) |
| Filing 2 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) for Personal Injuries by Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC. (Junker, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC from NM Fifth Judicial District, case number D-504-CV-2019-00403. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Junker, Lawrence) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number 1084-6472441 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Patterson-UTI Drilling Company, LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Junker, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
