Rodas Godinez v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
| Josue Isaac Rodas Godinez |
| U.S. Department of Justice, Chad Wolf, Director Matthew T. Albence, Corey Price, John F. Bash, William Barr and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
| 2:2020cv00466 |
| May 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kea W Riggs |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Habeas Corpus: Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Briefing Schedule Filed 5/14/2020. Response Due 5/28/2020. Reply Due 6/11/2020. (ve)
|
| Filing 9 Case transferred in from District of Texas Western; Case Number 3:20-cv-00107. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (dr) |
| United States District Judge Kea W. Riggs and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (dr) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER TERMINATING #5 Motion for TRO; TERMINATING #5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART #6 Motion to Dismiss. It is further ORDERED that this matter in IMMEDIATELY TRANSFERRED to the Las Cruces Division of the US District Court for the District of New Mexico, Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (mt) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.]
|
| Filing 7 RESPONSE to Motion, filed by Josue Isaac Rodas Godinez, re #6 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Respondent William Barr, Respondent U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Respondent John F. Bash, Respondent Matthew Albence, Respondent Chad Wolf, Respondent Corey Price (Wedemeyer, Jacob) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.] |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by Matthew Albence, William Barr, John F. Bash, Corey Price, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Chad Wolf. (Romero, Manuel) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.] |
| Filing 5 OPPOSED PETITIONERS MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Josue Isaac Rodas Godinez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order)(dc) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.] |
|
Text Order GRANTING #4 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages entered by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (KC) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.]
|
| Filing 4 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation by Josue Isaac Rodas Godinez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Motion for TRO/PI, #3 Exhibit Exhibits A-G, #4 Exhibit Proposed Order on Motion for TRO/PI)(Wedemeyer, Jacob) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.] |
| Filing 3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Josue Isaac Rodas Godinez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(dc) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER GRANTING #1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Kathleen Cardone. (dc) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.]
|
| Filing 1 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Josue Isaac Rodas Godinez. (Attachments: #1 Writ 2241, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(jg1) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.] |
| If ordered by the court, all referrals will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Berton (jg1) [Transferred from Texas Western on 5/14/2020.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
