Garcia v. Sena et al
| 2:2020cv00601 |
| September 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Las Cruces Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Settlement Conference set for April 18, 2023 at 09:00 AM via Zoom. Telephonic Status Conference set for March 22, 2023 at 11:00 AM. Consult Order for associated deadlines. (atc)
|
|
Filing
91
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Joint Status Report due by November 21, 2022. Telephonic Scheduling Conference set for November 29, 2022 at 10:00 AM. (atc)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea granting 89 Unopposed Motion to Vacate 79 Order for Martinez Report and associated deadlines, and to Strike from the Record 84 Defendants' Martinez Report. The Court will set a scheduling conference by separate order. (atc)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to Notify Court of Current Address. (atc)
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea granting 80 Motion to Extend Martinez Report. Martinez Report due August 10, 2022. Response due September 12, 2022. Reply due October 12, 2022. (atc)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER for Martinez Report by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza Defendants' Martinez Report due by 7/26/2022. Plaintiff's Response due by 8/26/2022. Defendants' Reply due by 9/26/2022. (crc)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza vacating the Scheduling Order, (Doc. 53), and directing Plaintiff to submit a status report by 12/21/2021. The Clerk's Office is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy of this Order. (crc)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER QUASHING 70 Order to Show Cause by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. (crc)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. Plaintiff's counsel, Freeman Faust, shall show cause by 10/15/2021. (crc)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza granting 64 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery to terminate on 10/14/21. (crc)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference for 10/13/2021 at 02:00 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. [Parties shall call Judge Garza's AT&T Teleconference line at (877) 810-9415, follow the prompts, and enter access code 7467959, to be connected to the proceedings.] (crc)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER Setting Telephonic Status Conference for 7/20/2021 at 02:30 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. [Parties shall call Judge Garza's AT&T Teleconference line at (877) 810-9415, follow the prompts, and enter access code 7467959, to be connected to the proceedings.] (ke)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER quashing 49 the Order to Show Cause by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. (crc)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. Show Cause Response due by 5/21/2021. (crc)
|
|
Filing
47
The Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference previously set for 5/3/21, is RESET for 5/26/2021, at 2:30 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. [Parties shall call Judge Garza's AT&T Teleconference line at (877) 810-9415, follow the prompts, and enter the Access Code 7467959, to be connected to the proceedings.] (crc)
|
|
Filing
39
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. A Joint Status Report is due by 4/26/2021. A Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference is set for 5/3/2021, at 2:30 PM before Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. [Parties shall ca ll Judge Garza's AT&T Teleconference line at (877) 810-9415, follow the prompts, and enter the Access Code 7467959, to be connected to the proceedings.] Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 3/31/2021. (crc)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza granting 30 Plaintiff's Fourth Motion to Extend. Service of summons and complaint due by 2/16/2021. Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's complaint due by 3/9/2021. (crc)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza granting 28 Third Motion to Extend. Service of summons and complaint due by 1/14/2021. Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's complaint due by 2/4/2021. (crc)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza granting 18 Motion to Quash. Service of summons and complaint as to Defendants John Doe 1 and Officer Santino due by 12/13/2020. (crc)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Setting Expedited Briefing Schedule on 18 Defendants' Motion to Quash summons issued to Doe and Santino pursuant to 12(b)(4) and 12(b)(5), by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza. Plaintiff's response due 10/21/2020. Defendants Doe and Santino's reply due 10/26/2020. (crc) (crc)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza granting 7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Ross Bettis terminated. (crc)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza granting 5 ORDER on Motion to Extend. Service of summons and complaint due by 10/7/2020. Defendants' responses to Plaintiff's complaint due by 10/28/20. (crc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garcia v. Sena et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
