Pipkin v. Martinez et al
| Robert Lawrence Pipkin |
| Attorney General of the State of New Mexico and R Martinez |
| 2:2020cv00848 |
| August 24, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Robert C Brack |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (kfo)
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Petition for 2254 Relief by Attorney General of the State of New Mexico, R Martinez. (Bernstein, Jane) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Jane Bernstein on behalf of Attorney General of the State of New Mexico, R Martinez (Bernstein, Jane) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO ANSWER by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. (cm)
|
| Filing 3 Filing Fee: $ 5.00, receipt number ALB047612 (snw)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER to Cure Defects by Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough. Within 30 days of entry of this Order, Petitioner must prepay the $5 filing fee or, alternatively, submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (cm)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Robert Lawrence Pipkin. (ln) |
| United States Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack and United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
