Reno v. Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy et al
Edward Reno |
Billy Massingill, S.D. Kurimski, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy and Richard T. Bannister |
2:2020cv00918 |
September 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Gregory J Fouratt |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT by All Defendants (Roman, David) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Richard T. Bannister, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy, S.D. Kurimski, Billy Massingill re #7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by S.D. Kurimski, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy, Richard T. Bannister, Billy Massingill (Drebing, Mark) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. The Court notes that, pursuant to the parties' 9/29/2020 email correspondence with the Court, the parties have validly stipulated that Plaintiff shall have until 10/29/2020 in which to file his response to Defendants' #7 Motion to Dismiss Under Rule 12(b)(6). Regarding any future stipulated extensions of time, the Court notifies the parties that such deadlines "may be extended by agreement of all parties," and without a request for a Court order, so long as "the party requesting the extension... file[s] a notice identifying the new deadline and the document (response or reply) to be filed." D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.4(a). (gbg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 8 ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF A SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Considering the pending Motion to Dismiss #7 , the Court hereby finds good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 to delay holding a scheduling conference and entering a scheduling order. The Court will set the case for scheduling once the presiding judge resolves the pending motion. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (atc) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Richard T. Bannister, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy, S.D. Kurimski, Billy Massingill. (Drebing, Mark) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Edward Reno, 4 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge,, filed by S.D. Kurimski, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy, Richard T. Bannister, Billy Massingill. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (cfa) |
Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Edward Reno voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Morales, Ali)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 4 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Richard T. Bannister, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy, S.D. Kurimski, Billy Massingill voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Huss, Brandon)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 3 Transmittal of State Court Documents by Richard T. Bannister, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy, S.D. Kurimski, Billy Massingill (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Drebing, Mark) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7297771 re #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by S.D. Kurimski, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy, Billy Massingill (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Drebing, Mark) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by S.D. Kurimski, Richard T Bannister, Billy Massingill, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy from Fifth Judicial District Court, case number D-503-CV-2020-00296. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by S.D. Kurimski, Richard T Bannister, Billy Massingill, Board of County Commissioners for the County of Eddy. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Drebing, Mark) |
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (arp) |
United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.