Price v. Whitten et al
| Mark Price |
| Francis Whitten, The City of Las Cruces doing business as The Las Cruces Police Department and Thaddeus Allen |
| 2:2020cv01099 |
| October 26, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Robert C Brack |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Thaddeus Allen, The City of Las Cruces, Francis Whitten re #4 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Retaliation, Trespass, and State Contitutional Claims filed by Francis Whitten, The City of Las Cruces, Thaddeus Allen (Standridge, Mark)
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Retaliation, Trespass, and State Contitutional Claims filed by Thaddeus Allen, The City of Las Cruces, Francis Whitten. (Standridge, Mark)
|
|
Filing 11
NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 3. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg)
|
|
Filing 10
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to Sr. District Judge Robert C. Brack as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF A SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Considering the pending Motion to Dismiss based on qualified immunity #4 , the Court hereby finds good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 to delay holding a scheduling conference and entering a scheduling order. The Court will set the case for scheduling once the presiding judge resolves the pending motion. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.] (atc)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE to Motion re #4 Partial MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Retaliation, Trespass, and State Contitutional Claims, #6 Partial MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM as to Plaintiff's Retaliation, Trespass, and State Constitutional Claim filed by Mark Price. (Strickland, Margaret)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed within 10 days. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh)
|
|
Filing 6
DUPLICATE ENTRY Partial MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM as to Plaintiff's Retaliation, Trespass, and State Constitutional Claim by Thaddeus Allen, The City of Las Cruces, Francis Whitten. (Standridge, Mark) Modified text to add Duplicate Entry as per Assistant Erika for Attorney Mark Standridge on 12/2/2020 (nr).
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by Mark D Standridge on behalf of All Defendants (Standridge, Mark)
|
|
Filing 4
Partial MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Retaliation, Trespass, and State Contitutional Claims by Thaddeus Allen, The City of Las Cruces, Francis Whitten. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Rogers, Cody)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Thaddeus Allen, The City of Las Cruces, Francis Whitten. (dr)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Civil Rights Violations and State Tort Claims against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Mark Price. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Strickland, Margaret)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 400 receipt number ANMDC-7376934 re #1 Complaint filed by Mark Price (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Strickland, Margaret)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (arp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
