Rollerson v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
| Natalie Rollerson |
| Wells Fargo Bank, NA and Wells Fargo & Company |
| 2:2020cv01318 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Carmen E Garza |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, NA voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Oller, Robert)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Telephonic Rule 16(c) Hearing set for March 17, 2021 at 09:00 AM. Joint Status Report due by March 9, 2021. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than February 19, 2021. (atc)
|
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, NA identifying Corporate Parent Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Other Affiliate Wells Fargo & Company for Wells Fargo & Company; Other Affiliate Wells Fargo & Company for Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (Oller, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, NA. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Natalie Rollerson.(Oller, Robert) |
| Summons Issued as to Wells Fargo & Company, Wells Fargo Bank, NA. (jg) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Natalie Rollerson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Right to Sue, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Cover Sheet)(Joeckel, David) |
| REFUND REQUESTED - Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number CNMDC-7461904 re #1 Complaint filed by Natalie Rollerson (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Joeckel, David) Modified on 12/18/2020 (arp). |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7462252 re #1 Complaint filed by Natalie Rollerson (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Joeckel, David) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (arp) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (arp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
