Schmal v. Luna County et al
| Raymond William Schmal |
| Michael Brown, Luna County Animal Control Shelter, Deming Animal Guardians, Luis Molina, Sandy Foster, Luna County, FNU Does, Luna County Sheriff's Department, Tammy McCoy and Mike Reitz |
| 2:2020cv01324 |
| December 18, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Gregory J Fouratt |
| Carmen E Garza |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Summons Issued as to Luna County. (arn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO #2 PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND #3 FILE ELECTRONICALLY AND ORDER FOR SERVICE by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. The Clerk of the Court shall serve Defendant Luna County by delivering a copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint to Luna County's chief executive officer. In addition, the Clerk of the Court shall notify Defendants Deming Animal Guardians, Michael Brown, Luis Molina, Sandy Foster, Tammy McCoy, and Mike Reitz, that an action has been commenced and request that Defendants waive service pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d). This notice shall include a copy of #1 Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk shall mail the notice, waiver and a copy of the Complaint to these Defendants at the addresses provided by Plaintiff in the Complaint. (gbg)
|
|
Filing 8
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza assigned. (dr)
|
|
Filing 7
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (arp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 6
Case transferred in from District of Texas Western; Case Number 7:20-cv-00277. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (arp)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt assigned. (arp)
|
|
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (arp)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Signed by Judge David Counts. (slt) [Transferred from Texas Western on 12/18/2020.]
|
|
Filing 5
Pro Se MOTION for Permission to file Electronically by Raymond William Schmal. (slt) [Transferred from Texas Western on 12/18/2020.]
|
|
Filing 3
Case Opening Letter. (slt) [Transferred from Texas Western on 12/18/2020.]
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raymond William Schmal. (slt) [Transferred from Texas Western on 12/18/2020.]
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT filed by Raymond William Schmal. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(slt) [Transferred from Texas Western on 12/18/2020.]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
