Rees v. Clovis Police Department et al
Richard Gene Rees |
FNU Tipton, Clovis Police Department, Mark Gallegos, Cook Mackenzie, FNU Brumwell, Curry County Detention Center, FNU Flashy and Curry County Sheriffs Department |
2:2021cv00079 |
January 28, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kenneth J Gonzales |
Jerry H Ritter |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT re #3 Amended Complaint by Richard Gene Rees (jjs) |
Filing 5 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter granting #2 the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and waiving the initial payment. Plaintiff is ordered to file monthly financial certificates and make monthly payments of twenty percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to his account until the fee is paid or show cause why the payment should be excused. (cd) |
Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants., filed by Richard Gene Rees. (jjs) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Richard Gene Rees. (ln) |
Filing 1 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Richard Gene Rees. (ln) |
United States District Judge Kenneth J. Gonzales and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (ln) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.