Smith v. Sysco Corporation et al
| Cory Smith |
| Sysco Corporation, Sygma Network Inc, Zurich American Insurance Company and Daniel Lone |
| 2:2021cv00940 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Gregory J Fouratt |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Steven C Yarbrough |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Letter Remanding Case to State Court by Victoria Harvell #10 (vh)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER REMANDING CASE by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. This case is REMANDED back to the Fifth Judicial District Court in Lea County, New Mexico for further proceedings. (gbg)
|
|
Filing 9
STIPULATION re #1 Notice of Removal, Notice of Withdrawal of Defendants' Notice of Removal by Daniel Lone, Sygma Network Inc, Sysco Corporation, Zurich American Insurance Company (Dow, Clinton)
|
|
Filing 8
RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Cory Smith. (Berenson, Rachel)
|
|
Filing 7
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar. Defendants are granted leave to amend #1 their Notice of Removal to adequately allege subject-matter jurisdiction no later than October 21, 2021. (am)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Because a dispositive motion has been filed in this case, the parties are reminded, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as the trial judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed by October 19, 2021. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (gbg)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.]
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Daniel Lone, Sygma Network Inc, Sysco Corporation, Zurich American Insurance Company. (Dow, Clinton)
|
|
Filing 4
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
Filing 3
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar as the trial and pretrial judges. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough, United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg)
|
|
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (jg)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (arp)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Zurich American Insurance Company, Sygma Network Inc, Sysco Corporation, Daniel Lone from Fifth Judicial District Court, case number D-506-CV-2021-00758. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Zurich American Insurance Company, Sygma Network Inc, Sysco Corporation, Daniel Lone. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Dow, Clinton)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7908373 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Sysco Corporation, Zurich American Insurance Company, Sygma Network Inc, Daniel Lone (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Dow, Clinton)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Steven C. Yarbrough and United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (arp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
