Hart v. Walmart et al
| Myrtis Paulo Hart |
| Walmart, Walmart Corporation and Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 2:2021cv01107 |
| November 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Kevin R Sweazea |
| Martha Vazquez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (gr)
|
|
Filing 8
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order to Cure Defects. Mail sent to Myrtis Paulo Hart. (gr)
|
|
Filing 7
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #2 Order. Mail sent to Myrtis Paulo Hart. (gr)
|
|
Filing 6
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order to Cure Defects and #4 Complaint. Mail sent to Myrtis Paulo Hart. (gr)
|
|
Filing 5
Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #3 Order to Cure Defects and #4 Complaint. Mail sent to Myrtis Paulo Hart. (gr)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER to Cure Defects by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. Plaintiff must cure defects by December 17, 2021. (atc)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Redaction by Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea. (atc)
|
|
United States District Judge Martha Vazquez and United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea assigned. (dr)
|
|
Filing 1
1983 PRISONER'S CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Myrtis Paulo Hart. (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
