Silva v. Agave Transportation Services, Inc
| Javier Silva |
| Agave Transportation Services, Inc |
| 2:2021cv01117 |
| November 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Gregory J Fouratt |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar SETTING telephonic Status Conference for January 25, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. MST. Counsel must call Judge Vidmar's AT&T Conference Line at (888) 363-4734 (access code: 4382538) to connect to the proceedings. (nlb)
|
|
Filing 3
DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES ANSWER to Complaint by Agave Transportation Services, Inc. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Javier Silva.(Blanco, Steven)
|
|
Summons Issued as to Agave Transportation Services, Inc. (dr)
|
|
Filing 2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Agave Transportation Services, Inc ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Javier Silva. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Silva Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Arbuckle, Melinda)
|
|
United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt and United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar assigned. (dr)
|
|
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-7998810 re #1 Complaint filed by Javier Silva (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Arbuckle, Melinda)
|
|
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 2 (Las Cruces) to 2 (Las Cruces). (dr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Silva v. Agave Transportation Services, Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Javier Silva | |
| Represented By: | Ricardo J. Prieto |
| Represented By: | Melinda Arbuckle |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Agave Transportation Services, Inc | |
| Represented By: | Robert Michael Estrada |
| Represented By: | Steven J Blanco |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
