Riordan v. U.S. Marine Corp. et al
J Tyrone Riordan |
U.S. Marine Corp., U.S. Navy, U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, U.S. Coast Gaurd, N.A.S.A., U.S. Department of Justice, Angie Schnieder and Twelfth Judicial District Court |
2:2022cv00238 |
March 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Gregory J Fouratt |
William P Johnson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 FINAL JUDGMENT by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this civil habeas action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (cmm) |
Filing 7 ORDER OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson DENYING AS MOOT #4 Motion to Amend/Correct; GRANTING #6 Motion to Dismiss. (cmm) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Close Case by J Tyrone Riordan. (cmm) |
Filing 5 Letter by J. Tyrone Riordan (arp) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Amend/Correct #2 Petition for 2254 Relief by J Tyrone Riordan. (cmm) |
Filing 3 Letter by J. Tyrone Riordan. (cmm) |
Filing 2 AMENDED PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by J Tyrone Riordan. (cmm) |
Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by J Tyrone Riordan. (dr) |
United States Chief District Judge William P. Johnson and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt assigned. (dr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.