Jarrott v. Madrid et al
Gabriella Jarrott |
Mark Madrid and Tim Q Johnson |
2:2022cv00298 |
April 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Gregory J Fouratt |
Carmen E Garza |
Gregory B Wormuth |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE OF RULE 73 CONSENT Received by All Parties. Related documents: 13 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Tim Q Johnson, 5 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Mark Madrid, 6 Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge, filed by Gabriella Jarrott. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bw) |
Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Tim Q Johnson voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Jarmie, Mark)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 12 NOTICE by Gabriella Jarrott re #7 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof, #9 MOTION to Stay Proceedings During Pendency of Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support & Agreed Upon Extension through August 10, 2022 to File Responses (Bregman, Sam) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge unless consents from all parties have been filed by 6/24/2022. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (ke) |
Filing 10 Amended MOTION to Amend/Correct Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings During Pendency of Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Tim Q Johnson, Mark Madrid. (Jarmie, Mark) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Stay Proceedings During Pendency of Motion to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support by Tim Q Johnson, Mark Madrid. (Jarmie, Mark) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark D. Jarmie on behalf of Mark Madrid (Jarmie, Mark) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss and Memorandum in Support Thereof by Mark Madrid. (Jarmie, Mark) |
Filing 6 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Gabriella Jarrott voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Bregman, Sam)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 5 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Mark Madrid voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Jarmie, Mark)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gabriella Jarrott. Tim Q Johnson served on 5/3/2022, answer due 5/24/2022. (Bregman, Sam) |
Summons Issued as to Tim Q Johnson, Mark Madrid. (jg) |
Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth as the pretrial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Civil Rights Violations and the Wrongful Death of Darian Jarrott against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Gabriella Jarrott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bregman, Sam) |
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (jg) |
United States Magistrate Judge Carmen E. Garza and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt assigned. (jg) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8229350 re #1 Complaint filed by Gabriella Jarrott (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Bregman, Sam) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.