Herrera v. Legendary Pipeline Construction LLC et al
| Joel Herrera |
| Legendary Pipeline Construction LLC and Jerrold Campos, Individually, Legendary Pipeline Construction LLC and Jerrold Campos |
| 2:2022cv00317 |
| April 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Stephan M Vidmar |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that this matter will be reassigned to a district judge as presiding judge if written consents from all parties have not been filed by July 1, 2022. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (rh) |
Filing 5
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth. Joint Status Report due July 14, 2022. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for July 28, 2022, at 3:00 PM. Parties shall call Judge Wormuth's teleconference line at (877) 402-9753, access code 7578461, to be connected to the proceedings. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 7/1/2022. (emm)
|
| Filing 4 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Jerrold Campos, Legendary Pipeline Construction LLC. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Joel Herrera.(Jones, Paul) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Joel Herrera. Legendary Pipeline Construction LLC served on 5/18/2022, answer due 6/8/2022. (Morgan, Charles) |
| Summons Issued as to Jerrold Campos, Legendary Pipeline Construction LLC. (jg) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8242655 re #1 Complaint, filed by Joel Herrera (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Morgan, Charles) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (dr) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Stephan M. Vidmar and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (dr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Legendary Pipeline Construction LLC and Jerrold Campos, Individually ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Joel Herrera. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons Corp., #3 Proposed Summons Individually)(Morgan, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
