Benavides et al v. Ladner et al
Rosie Morelos Benavides and Rudy Benavides Jacquez |
Ken Ladner, Freddie Portillo, Robert M. Esqueda, Milo Lambert, Danny Madrid, FNU Cardoza and FNU Flores |
2:2022cv00584 |
August 5, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Gregory B Wormuth |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), FNU Cardoza, Robert M. Esqueda, FNU Flores, Ken Ladner, Milo Lambert, Freddie Portillo voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Isaacson, Thomas Lynn)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 9 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by FNU Cardoza, Robert M. Esqueda, FNU Flores, Ken Ladner, Milo Lambert, Freddie Portillo (Isaacson, Thomas Lynn) |
Filing 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND by Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth denying #7 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint and Seek Other Consequential/Equitable Remedies. (emm) |
Filing 7 PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND SEEK OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL/EQUITABLE REMEDIES by Rosie Morelos Benavides and Rudy Benavides Jacquez. (cer) |
Filing 6 Transmittal of State Court Documents by FNU Cardoza, Robert M. Esqueda, FNU Flores, Ken Ladner, Milo Lambert, Freddie Portillo (Isaacson, Thomas Lynn) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by FNU Cardoza, Robert M. Esqueda, FNU Flores, Ken Ladner, Milo Lambert, Freddie Portillo. (Isaacson, Thomas Lynn) |
Filing 4 Filing fee was Received Online: $ 402.00, receipt number ANMDC-8400944 (bap)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 2 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT Civil Cover Sheet by Fernando Cardoza, Robert M. Esqueda, Richard Flores, Ken Ladner, Milo Lambert, Freddie Portillo (Isaacson, Thomas Lynn) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Grant County District Court, case number D-608-CV-2022-00157. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)(Isaacson, Thomas Lynn) |
United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (jg) |
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.