Nelums v. Mandu Wellness LLC et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Nelums
Defendant: Mandu Wellness LLC, Aaron Mandujan, Brian Patrick Stickney and 777 Brands LLC
Case Number: 2:2022cv00828
Filed: November 2, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Kevin R Sweazea
Referring Judge: Gregory B Wormuth
Nature of Suit: Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 777 Brands LLC (Ferguson, Kenneth)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mandu Wellness LLC (Ferguson, Kenneth)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Brian Patrick Stickney, Aaron Mandujan, Mandu Wellness LLC, 777 Brands LLC from 12th Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, case number D-1226-CV-2022-00019. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Brian Patrick Stickney, Aaron Mandujan, Mandu Wellness LLC, 777 Brands LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ferguson, Kenneth)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (dr)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8536531 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by 777 Brands LLC, Brian Patrick Stickney, Aaron Mandujan, Mandu Wellness LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Ferguson, Kenneth)
November 2, 2022 Opinion or Order United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (dr)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nelums v. Mandu Wellness LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Nelums
Represented By: Sidney Childress
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mandu Wellness LLC
Represented By: Kenneth Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Aaron Mandujan
Represented By: Kenneth Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Patrick Stickney
Represented By: Kenneth Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 777 Brands LLC
Represented By: Kenneth Ferguson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?