Dupre v. Social Security Administration
| Melissa Shermelle Dupre |
| Social Security Administration |
| 2:2023cv00124 |
| February 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Las Cruces Office |
| Kirtan Khalsa |
| John F Robbenhaar |
| David H Urias |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar. Briefing Schedule Filed 3/28/2023; Motion to Remand Due 4/28/2023; Response Due 5/30/2023; Reply Due 6/13/2023. (kc)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER by Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar granting #10 Motion to Seal Administrative Record. (kc)
|
| Filing 10 Unopposed MOTION to Seal Administrative Record by Social Security Administration. (Lucero, Manuel) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar by District Judge David H. Urias. (bap)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 6. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
| Filing 7 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge David H. Urias and Magistrate Judge John F. Robbenhaar as the trial and pretrial judges. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard W Pruett on behalf of Social Security Administration (Pruett, Richard) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa. Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2) is granted. Plaintiff may proceed without prepayment of costs or other fees or the need to provide security therefor. (nlb)
|
| Filing 3 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| NOTICE: The parties are notified that effective December 1, 2022, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure were amended to add Supplemental Rules for Social Security cases filed under 42 U.S.C 405(g). Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Supplemental Rules for Social Security Actions under 42 U.S.C. 405(g), the Clerk hereby transmits a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system to the Social Security Administration's Office of General Counsel and to the United States Attorney's Office, notifying the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration of the filing of a Complaint in this action. The parties should review and comply with these rules in full. In relevant part, the rules result in the following changes: 1. Eliminate the need for service under FED. R. CIV. P. 4. Instead, the Court will transmit a Notice of Electronic Filing to the SSA's Office of General Counsel and the USAO for the district where the action is filed. 2. Require the Commissioner to file the administrative record within 60 days of receipt of the Notice of Electronic Filing. 3. Require the parties to adhere to the following briefing schedule: - Plaintiff's brief due 30 days after answer/administrative record filed and served. - Commissioners response due 30 days after plaintiffs brief filed and served. - Plaintiffs reply due 14 days after the Commissioners response filed and served.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Kirtan Khalsa assigned. (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dupre v. Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Melissa Shermelle Dupre | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Robert McGarry |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Richard W Pruett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
