Merchant Livestock Company v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al
Merchant Livestock Company |
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and Tetra Technologies, Inc. |
2:2023cv00257 |
March 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Kea W Riggs |
Jerry H Ritter |
Kevin R Sweazea |
Torts to Land |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Torts to Land |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (Sutphin, Robert) |
Filing 26 REPLY to Response to Motion re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss -- Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Reply in Further Support of Its Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc.. (Sutphin, Robert) |
Filing 25 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by Tetra Technologies, Inc. re #14 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tetra Technologies, Inc. (Huertaz, Armand) |
Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tetra Technologies, Inc.. (Huertaz, Armand) |
Filing 23 NOTICE by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. re #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss Notice of Extension of Time for Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc. To File Reply to Partial Motion to Dismiss (Sutphin, Robert) |
Filing 22 NOTICE by Tetra Technologies, Inc. Notice of Extension of Time to file Tetras Reply in Support of its Partial Motion to Dismiss from May 12, 2023 to a new deadline on May 19, 2023 (Alderete, D.) Modified on 5/11/2023 (cmm). |
Filing 21 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 16. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
Filing 20 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly reassigned to U.S. District Judge Kea W. Riggs as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. District Judge Judith C. Herrera no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
Filing 19 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to United States District Judge Judith C. Herrera as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 18 RESPONSE to Motion re #14 Partial MOTION to Dismiss , #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Merchant Livestock Company. (Dugan, Kenneth) |
Filing 17 ORDER Finding Good Cause to Delay Issuance of Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Defendants' #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss filed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc., and #14 Partial MOTION to Dismiss filed by Tetra Technologies, Inc., may be dispositive and, if granted, would eliminate the need for some or all discovery. Per Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), I thus find good cause to delay issuance of a scheduling order in this case until the motions are resolved. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (sjl) |
Filing 15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Chevron Corporation for Chevron U.S.A. Inc.. (Serafimova, Olga) |
Filing 14 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Tetra Technologies, Inc.. (Alderete, D.) |
Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Tetra Technologies, Inc.. (Alderete, D.) |
Filing 12 Amended Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tetra Technologies, Inc. (Alderete, D.) Modified text on 4/24/2023 (ac). |
Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Tetra Technologies, Inc. (Alderete, D.) |
Filing 10 NOTICE by Tetra Technologies, Inc. Extension of Time (Alderete, D.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by Merchant Livestock Company Plaintiff Merchant Livestock's Corporate Disclosure Statement (Dugan, Kenneth) |
Filing 8 JOINDER to #5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss joined by Defendant Tetra Technologies, Inc.. (Alderete, D.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by D. Chet Alderete on behalf of Tetra Technologies, Inc. (Alderete, D.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2) and considering the pending dispositive motion, the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 10 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (atc)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'s Partial Motion to Dismiss by Chevron U.S.A. Inc.. (Sutphin, Robert) |
Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (Sutphin, Robert) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. Notice of Extension of Time for Defendant Chevron U.S.A. Inc. to File a Responsive Pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint (Sutphin, Robert) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (jg) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. from Fifth Judicial District Court, Lea County, case number D-506-CV-2023-00143. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-1, #2 Exhibit A-2, #3 Exhibit A-3, #4 Exhibit A-4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sutphin, Robert) |
Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-8745165 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Chevron U.S.A. Inc. (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Sutphin, Robert) |
United States Magistrate Judge Kevin R. Sweazea and Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (jg) |
Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (jg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.