Robinson et al v. Gutierrez et al
Vasshawn Robinson, Christopher Miller and Teresa Grady |
Amy Gutierrez, Kevin Gutierrez, Carl Tennison, City of Tatum and Curry Pruitt |
2:2023cv00445 |
May 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Jerry H Ritter |
Gregory B Wormuth |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), City of Tatum voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Evans, Bryan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Curry Pruitt voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Evans, Bryan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Carl Tennison voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Evans, Bryan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 11 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Kevin Gutierrez voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Evans, Bryan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge. Under 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73(b), Amy Gutierrez voluntarily consent(s) to have United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial, and order the entry of final judgment. (Evans, Bryan)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Motion to Dismiss by Vasshawn Robinson. (Sirotkin, Eric) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 7 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (kls) [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 7 ORDER Finding Good Cause to Delay Issuance of Scheduling Order by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. Defendant City of Tatum's #6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM may be dispositive and, if granted, would eliminate the need for discovery. Per Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), I thus find good cause to delay issuance of a scheduling order in this case until the motion is resolved. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (sjl) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by City of Tatum. (Evans, Bryan) |
Summons Issued as to City of Tatum, Amy Gutierrez, Kevin Gutierrez, Curry Pruitt, Carl Tennison on Amended Complaint. (dr) |
Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 402, receipt number ANMDC-8836560 re #1 COMPLAINT For Damages against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Vasshawn Robinson. (Sirotkin, Eric) filed by Vasshawn Robinson (arp)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Damages against All Defendants. adding Curry Pruitt and Carl Tennison., filed by Vasshawn Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sirotkin, Eric) |
Filing 3 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT (Civil Cover Sheet) re #1 Complaint for Damages by Vasshawn Robinson (Sirotkin, Eric) Modified on 5/23/2023 (bc). |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (dr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Damages against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Vasshawn Robinson. (Sirotkin, Eric) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.