Gonzalez v. Kasperski et al
Alfredo Gonzalez |
Kristine Kasperski and G.T. Mobile Home Movers |
2:2023cv00526 |
June 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Gregory J Fouratt |
William P Johnson |
Personal Injury: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 RULE 58 JUDGMENT by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson. Case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (fs) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by Chief District Judge William P. Johnson DENYING #5 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915. Case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (fs) |
Chief United States District Judge William P. Johnson assigned. (jg) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Alfredo Gonzalez. (vh) |
Filing 4 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Alfredo Gonzalez. (vh) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Show cause response due 7/17/2023. (gbg) |
Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt has been assigned for a 28 U.S.C. 1915 review. (bc)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G.T. Mobile Home Movers, Kristine Kasperski, filed by Alfredo Gonzalez. (ac) |
United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.