Cox v. Rios et al
Hector Rios and Attorney General of New Mexico |
Donnell Travis Cox |
2:2023cv00646 |
August 3, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
Matthew L Garcia |
Jerry H Ritter |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Mail Returned as Undeliverable "Paroled" re Staff Notes. Mail sent to Donnell Travis Cox (bap) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #1 Petition for 2254 Relief. Mail sent to Donnell Travis Cox (fs) |
Filing 4 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re Staff Notes re Blank 2254 Form along with a blank Application to Proceed Without Paying Fees and Costs.. Mail sent to Donnell Travis Cox at Otero County. (BP remailed blank 2254 form along with blank Application to Proceed to Mr. Cox at new address at Southern Correctional Facility) (bap) |
Filing 3 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re #1 Petition for 2254 Relief. Mail sent to Donnell Travis Cox. (cmm) |
Filing 2 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Donnell Travis Cox (arp) |
Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Donnell Travis Cox. (bc) |
United States District Judge Matthew L. Garcia and United States Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter assigned. (bc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.