Garrison v. Altus Technology Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff: Donald Garrison
Defendant: Altus Technology Solutions, LLC
Case Number: 2:2023cv00812
Filed: September 21, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of New Mexico
Presiding Judge: Gregory J Fouratt
Referring Judge: Margaret I Strickland
2 Judge: Gregory B Wormuth
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2023 Filing 8 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Margaret I. Strickland as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Chief Magistrate Jud Gregory B. Wormuth no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr)
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b)(2), and in light of #6 Defendant's 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss, the Court FINDS good cause to delay entering a Rule 16 scheduling order in this case.The deadlines fixed in the Court's #5 Amended Initial Scheduling Order and the initial scheduling conference set for 11/30/23, are hereby VACATED. The deadline to submit consents remains. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 11/14/2023. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (am)
November 13, 2023 Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) by Altus Technology Solutions, LLC. (Burns, Clara)
October 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 AMENDED [AS TO TIME OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE] INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Telephonic Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 11/30/2023 at 11:00 AM in Las Cruces - Telephonic Hearing/Conference before Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan due by 11/20/2023. Unless otherwise notified by the Clerk or the Court a notice of consent or non-consent for this case to proceed before the trial Magistrate Judge should be submitted by each party no later than 11/14/2023. (am)
September 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt. Rule 16 Telephonic Hearing set for 11/30/2023 at 02:00 PM. Joint Status Report due by 11/20/2023. (mjm)
September 27, 2023 Filing 3 Defendant's ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) (to First Amended Complaint) by Altus Technology Solutions, LLC. (Burns, Clara)
September 21, 2023 Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc)
September 21, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Altus Technology Solutions, LLC from Ninth Judicial District Court of New Mexico, case number D-911-CV-2023-00077. ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Altus Technology Solutions, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)(Burns, Clara)
September 21, 2023 Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 402 receipt number ANMDC-9015793 re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Altus Technology Solutions, LLC (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Burns, Clara)
September 21, 2023 United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth and United States Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Fouratt assigned. (bc)
September 21, 2023 Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (bc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garrison v. Altus Technology Solutions, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Garrison
Represented By: John S. Hightower
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altus Technology Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Clara B Burns
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?