Certain Underwriters at Lloyds et al v. Dittrich et al
| Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, United Specialty Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, HDI Global Specialty SE, Old Republic Union Insurance Company, GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company and Transverse Specialty Insurance Company |
| Wade Dittrich and Tristan Payne |
| 2:2024cv00273 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Damian L Martinez |
| Gregory B Wormuth |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENT re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet by Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona, GeoVera Specialty Insurance Company, HDI Global Specialty SE, Indian Harbor Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, Old Republic Union Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company, Steadfast Insurance Company, Transverse Specialty Insurance Company, United Specialty Insurance Company (Vandiford, William) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (eh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, QBE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, OLD REPUBLIC UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, HDI GLOBAL SPECIALTY SE, STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND TRANSVERSE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL SECURITY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ARIZONA. (Vandiford, William) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (eh) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-9272986 re #1 Complaint, filed by INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY, OLD REPUBLIC UNION INSURANCE COMPANY, LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, HDI GLOBAL SPECIALTY SE, GEOVERA SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND TRANSVERSE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, GENERAL SECURITY INDEMNITY COMPANY OF ARIZONA, STEADFAST INSURANCE COMPANY, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS, LONDON, QBE SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Vandiford, William) |
| United States Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez and United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth assigned. (eh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
