Alvarado v. State of New Mexico et al
| Roman Alvarado |
| State of New Mexico, Department of Public Safety, Leonel Mendez, Andrew Lane, Ashley Herrera and City of Hobbs |
| 2:2025cv00721 |
| July 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| William P Johnson |
| Damian L Martinez |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: Nos. 20 and 23. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (kg) |
| Filing 27 NOTICE by City of Hobbs re #24 Reply to Response to Motion Defendant City of Hobbs' Notice of Supplement (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Deakyne, Andrew) |
| Filing 26 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge William P. Johnson as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Chief Magistrate Jud Gregory B. Wormuth no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (bc) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Briefing Complete by City of Hobbs re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of Hobbs' Motion to Dismiss filed by City of Hobbs (Deakyne, Andrew) |
| Filing 24 REPLY to Response to Motion re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of Hobbs' Motion to Dismiss Defendant City of Hobbs' Reply In Support of its Motion to Dismiss filed by City of Hobbs. (Deakyne, Andrew) |
| Filing 22 NOTICE by City of Hobbs re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of Hobbs' Motion to Dismiss Stipulated Notice of Extension of Pages (Deakyne, Andrew) |
| Filing 21 RESPONSE in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of Hobbs' Motion to Dismiss filed by Roman Alvarado. (Esquivel, Graciela) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF CONSENT SUBMISSION DEADLINE: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(2), the parties are reminded that a magistrate judge was assigned as the trial judge in this matter under 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The parties are advised that the Clerk will reassign this matter to a district judge as the trial judge no later than 21 days from the entry of this notice unless consents from all parties have been filed. The parties are free to withhold consent. If you have already entered your consent, you need not resubmit. (kls)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] |
Filing 18
ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO DELAY ENTRY OF A SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez. Considering the pending motion seeking dispositive relief, the Court hereby finds good cause under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 to delay holding a scheduling conference and entering a scheduling order. The Court will set the case for scheduling once the presiding judge resolves the pending motion. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. NO DOCUMENTS ARE ATTACHED.](dkf)
|
| Filing 17 MOTION to Dismiss Defendant City of Hobbs' Motion to Dismiss by City of Hobbs. (Deakyne, Andrew) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE by City of Hobbs re #1 Complaint Second Stipulated Notice of Extension of Time (Deakyne, Andrew) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT as to document #14 Certificate of Service by Roman Alvarado (Esquivel, Graciela) |
| Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Roman Alvarado COS Rule 68 Offers of Settlement (Esquivel, Graciela) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED ANSWER to Plaintiff's Complaint #1 Complaint State Defendants' Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Department of Public Safety, Leonel Mendez, State of New Mexico. (Zifferblatt, Renni) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE by City of Hobbs re #1 Complaint Stipulated Notice of Extension of Time (Deakyne, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand State Defendants' Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint by Department of Public Safety, Leonel Mendez, State of New Mexico. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Roman Alvarado.(Zifferblatt, Renni) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Renni Gisele Zifferblatt on behalf of Department of Public Safety, Leonel Mendez, State of New Mexico (Zifferblatt, Renni) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roman Alvarado. The City of Hobbs served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025. (Carpenter, Frances) Modified text on 8/21/2025 (vh). |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roman Alvarado. Ashley Herrera served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025.(Carpenter, Frances) Modified text on 8/21/2025 (vh). |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roman Alvarado. The State of New Mexico served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025. (Carpenter, Frances) Modified text on 8/21/2025 (vh). |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roman Alvarado. State of New Mexico served on 8/4/2025, answer due 8/25/2025. (Carpenter, Frances) Modified text on 8/21/2025 (vh). |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roman Alvarado. Andrew Lane served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025. (Carpenter, Frances) Modified text on 8/21/2025 (vh). |
| Filing 4 *FILED IN ERROR* SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roman Alvarado. City of Hobbs served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025; Ashley Herrera served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025; Andrew Lane served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025; State of New Mexico served on 8/4/2025, answer due 8/25/2025. (Carpenter, Frances) Modified text on 8/15/2025, attorney will re-file each Summons Returned Executed for each defendant separately. (cer). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Roman Alvarado. Department of Public Safety served on 8/5/2025, answer due 8/26/2025. (Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmd.uscourts.gov for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (dr) |
| Summons Issued as to City of Hobbs, Department of Public Safety, Ashley Herrera, Andrew Lane, Leonel Mendez, State of New Mexico. (dr) |
| United States Chief Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth and United States Magistrate Judge Damian L. Martinez assigned. (dr) |
| Office code correction. Case office code has been changed from 1 (Albuquerque) to 2 (Las Cruces). (dr) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing Fee - Online Payment), filed by Roman Alvarado. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Carpenter, Frances) |
| Filing and Administrative Fees Received: $ 405 receipt number ANMDC-10117654 re #1 Complaint filed by Roman Alvarado (Payment made via Pay.gov)(Carpenter, Frances) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
