USA For Jemez, Santa, et al v. Abousleman, et al
| USA and State of New Mexico |
| Tom Abouselman, Interested Parties, Jemez Springs Ditch Association, Canon Community Ditch Association, Darwin Hourigan, Board of Education of the Jemez Valley Public School District, Nacimiento Community Ditch Association, King Brothers, Public Lands Commissioner and Jemez River Basin Water Users Coalition |
| Pueblo of Jemez, Zia, Pueblo of and Santa Ana Pueblo of |
| 6:1983cv01041 |
| June 27, 1983 |
| US District Court for the District of New Mexico |
| Santa Fe Office |
| Sandoval |
| Jerry H. Ritter |
| Martha Vazquez |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4506
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. Related document(s): 4476 Brief, 4475 Brief. (cab)
|
|
Filing
4497
ORDER REFERRING CASE by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. This case is referred to MAGISTRATE JUDGE JENNIFER M. ROZZONI to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. (ve)
|
|
Filing
4470
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF LITIGATION by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The 4465 Expedited Joint Motion to Amend Order Extending Stay of Litigation, filed May 23, 2022, is DENIED. The Court RESETS the J une 8, 2022, deadline for the Pueblos of Jemez, Zia and Santa Ana, and the United States to file their initial briefs to September 14, 2022, with responses due on October 14, 2022, and replies due on November 14, 2022. The Settlement Parties SHALL FILE a monthly status report on Congressional-approval process of the Settlement Agreement with the first report due on July 15, 2022. (ve)
|
|
Filing
4463
ORDER REFERRING CASE by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. This case is referred to MAGISTRATE JUDGE JERRY H. RITTER to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. (ve)
|
|
Filing
4462
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND STAY OF LITIGATION by District Judge Kea W. Riggs. The 4453 Expedited Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [Doc. 4452, 10/28/21] is GRANTED. The Court EXTENDS the current stay of litigat ion in this case until June 1, 2022. The Court RESETS the March 1, 2022 deadline for the Pueblos of Jemez, Zia and Santa Ana, and the United States to file their initial briefs to June 8, 2022, with responses due on August 8, 2022, and replies due on September 7, 2022. No additional extensions of the stay of litigation will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. (ve)
|
|
Filing
4434
ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter. (Attachments: # 1 Temporary Administrative Order) (jdm)
|
|
Filing
4421
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER by District Judge Martha Vazquez DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 4403 MOTION Action on SM Report and Issue 4 and entry of final judgment ; GRANTING 4404 MOTION to Certify for Interlocutory Appeal; and GRANTING 4405 MOTION to Certify Court's September 30,2017 Order for Interlocutory Appeal. See Order for Specifics. (gr)
|
|
Filing
4414
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jerry H. Ritter granting 4412 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Robert Francis Medina terminated (jdm)
|
|
Filing
4397
ORDER ADOPTING 4383 United States Magistrate Judge William P. Lynch's Report and Recommendations by District Judge Martha Vazquez. (laz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New Mexico District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
