Green v. Walsh
Petitioner: Jamel Green
Respondent: James Walsh
Case Number: 1:2003cv03606
Filed: August 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Raymond J. Dearie
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 MEMORANDUM & ORDER: Petitioner, pro se, moves pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from this Court's 10/26/05 order denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner's motion is denied in all respects. C/M. Ordered by Chief Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 8/2/2010. (Chee, Alvin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jamel Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: James Walsh
Represented By: Alyson Joy Gill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?