Acme American Repairs, Inc. et al v. Katzenberg et al
Plaintiff: ACME American Refrigeration, Inc., ACME Commerical Kitchen Design, Inc., ACME Pacific Repairs, Inc., Acme American Environmental Co., Inc., Acme American Repairs, Inc., Bana Parts Commercial Kitchen, Inc. and Bana Parts, Inc.
Defendant: Harvey Katzenberg and Pearl Katzenberg
Case Number: 1:2003cv04740
Filed: September 24, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Steven M. Gold
Presiding Judge: Roslynn R. Mauskopf
Nature of Suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 302 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 269 281 290 294 298 : For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendant Katzenberg's motions for summary judgment in the related 2003 and 2014 actions are denied, as is his motion for injunctive relief in the 2014 action. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/30/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
September 28, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 301 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION relating to fees to the McNamara Firm and addressing the Firm's application for pre-judgment attachment: SEE ATTACHED ORDER. The Court overrules the plaintiffs objections, and adopts the Report and Recom mendation in its entirety. As such, the Court hereby Orders that the application by the Law Office to fix its fees be granted in the amount of $277,674.09. The Court denies plaintiffs application for sanctions against the law firm. The Court denies without prejudice the application for pre-judgment attachment in this and the related action, Katzenberg v. Acme American Repairs, Inc., 14-CV-5515. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/28/2015. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
July 8, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 164 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 162 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 163 Motion for Attorney Fees. For the reasons stated in the attached Order, Derval Lazzari is hereby ORDERED to reimburse defendants for $2, 514 in attorney's fees incurred preparing for and attending the settlement conference held on July 3, 2013. Ordered by Chief Mag. Judge Steven M. Gold on 7/8/2013. (Gold, Steven)
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 147 ORDER denying 142 Motion for Certificate of Appealability: For the reasons set forth in the attache Memorandum and Order, plaintiffs' request to certify the August 31, 2011 Order for appeal under Rule 54(b) is DENIED. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 8/13/2012. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
August 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 139 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, defendants motion to amend this Courts September 24, 2010 Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a) or Local Civil Rule 6.3, based on an oversight or omission in the order, is GRANTED, and, as previously Ordered by this Court, summary judgment dismissing all causes of action brought by Acme Pacific Repairs, Inc., Bana Parts, Inc. and Bana Commercial Kitchen Parts, Inc. remains GRANTED. (Defs. Mo t. to Modify Order (Doc. No. 132) at 1.) Plaintiffs motion for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), regarding the dismissal of the breach of contract claim and denial of summary judgment on the fraud, breach of fiduciary duty , breach of duty of loyalty, conversion, and employee disloyalty claims is DENIED. (Pls. Aff. in Oppn to Mot. (Doc. No. 135) at 2.) Plaintiffs Rule 60(a) motion requesting that the Court reconsider its discussion of in pari delicto is likewise DENI ED. (Id. at 4-5, 8.) Finally, the Court DENIES plaintiffs request that the Court alter its judgment based on the preclusive effect of two previous court judgments involving some of the same parties and events as the present action. (Mot. Alter J. (Doc. No. 137) at 1.) Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 8/31/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
September 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 130 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 121 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 122 ) is DENIED. This matter is recommitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge to resolve all remaining pre-trial issues, to supervise the preparation of a Joint Pre-Trial Order, and for any settlement discussions. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 9/24/2010. (Brucella, Michelle)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acme American Repairs, Inc. et al v. Katzenberg et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ACME American Refrigeration, Inc.
Represented By: Helen M. Benzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ACME Commerical Kitchen Design, Inc.
Represented By: Helen M. Benzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ACME Pacific Repairs, Inc.
Represented By: Helen M. Benzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Acme American Environmental Co., Inc.
Represented By: Helen M. Benzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Acme American Repairs, Inc.
Represented By: Helen M. Benzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bana Parts Commercial Kitchen, Inc.
Represented By: Helen M. Benzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bana Parts, Inc.
Represented By: Helen M. Benzie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harvey Katzenberg
Represented By: David B Gelfarb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pearl Katzenberg
Represented By: David B Gelfarb
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?