Steelmasters, Inc. v. Local Union 580 of the International Association or Bridge, Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO et al
Case Number: 1:2005cv00259
Filed: January 19, 2005
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Marilyn D. Go
Nature of Suit: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting in part 7 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court directs the parties to proceed with arbitration before the Honorable Eric J. Schmertz or a substitute Impartial Arbitrator selected in accordance with section XXIX of the CBA. Given the possibility that the arbitrator will rule that the agreement to arbitrate was terminated and this Court will need to determine whether an agreement to arbitrate exists based on petitioner's post-termination course of conduct, the Petition to Stay Arbitration is dismissed with leave to re-open within sixty days after such determination. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Marilyn D. Go on 2/1/08. (Proujansky, Josh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Steelmasters, Inc. v. Local Union 580 of the International Association or Bridge, Structural Ornamental and Reinforcing Iron Workers, AFL-CIO et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?