Ramratan et al v. New York City Board of Elections et al
| 1:2006cv04770 |
| August 31, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Nicholas G. Garaufis |
| Robert M. Levy |
| Civil Rights: Voting |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 17 Motion for Reconsideration --- For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration of the Order issued by the Hon. Nicholas G. Garaufis on September 8, 2006 is DENIED in its entirety. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 09/11/06. (Irizarry, Dora)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER GRANTING 11 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint and DENYING 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction.So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/8/06. (Garaufis, Nicholas G.)
|
|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. For the reasons set forth in the attached decision, Plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.So Ordered by Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis on 9/7/06.(Garaufis, Nicholas G.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramratan et al v. New York City Board of Elections et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
