Belton v. New York City Transit Authority

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Belton v. New York City Transit Authority

Belton v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Number:	1:2006cv05063
Filed:	September 14, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge:	Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge:	David G. Trager
Nature of Suit:	Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 4, 2006	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court grants plaintiff's requests to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915 and consolidates 06-CV-4362(as LEAD Case) with 06-CV-4363, 06-CV-4845 and 06-CV-5063 (as MEMBER Cases) solely for the purpos e of this Order. Each of the four pro se actions are dismissed. Belton v. New York City Transit Authority, 06-CV-5063(DGT) is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Moreover, plaintiff 's repeated filing of meritless actions, detailed herein, shall no longer be tolerated by the Court. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby warned that any future action which he may file can be reviewed and if plaintiff files any further basesless ac tions, the Court may enter an order barring the acceptance of any future complaints for filing without first obtaining leave of Court to do so. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. So Ordered. (Ordered by Judge David G. Trager, on 10/4/2006) C/M w/appeals packet by Pro Se Staff Attorney. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 4, 2006

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: The Court grants plaintiff's requests to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915 and consolidates 06-CV-4362(as LEAD Case) with 06-CV-4363, 06-CV-4845 and 06-CV-5063 (as MEMBER Cases) solely for the purpos e of this Order. Each of the four pro se actions are dismissed. Belton v. New York City Transit Authority, 06-CV-5063(DGT) is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Moreover, plaintiff 's repeated filing of meritless actions, detailed herein, shall no longer be tolerated by the Court. Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby warned that any future action which he may file can be reviewed and if plaintiff files any further basesless ac tions, the Court may enter an order barring the acceptance of any future complaints for filing without first obtaining leave of Court to do so. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. sec. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for purpose of an appeal. So Ordered. (Ordered by Judge David G. Trager, on 10/4/2006) C/M w/appeals packet by Pro Se Staff Attorney. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Belton v. New York City Transit Authority
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?