Assitalia Le Assicurazioni D'italia S.p.A. et al v. Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd. et al
Case Number: 1:2006cv06423
Filed: December 4, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
Presiding Judge: Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge: Dora Lizette Irizarry
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER DENYING 17 Motion for Summary Judgment, GRANTING ARBITRATION AND STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING ARBITRATION - For the reasons set forth in the ATTACHED WRITTEN MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, defendant's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. In add ition, the court finds that the Standard Ground Handling Agreement ("SGHA") applies to this action and plaintiffs have not waived their right to arbitration under the SGHA. Accordingly, plaintiffs' request to compel arbitration is GRA NTED and this action is STAYED pending the outcome of arbitration proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case without prejudice to the parties to move to reopen it upon the completion of the arbitration proceedings. SO ORDERED by Judge Dora Lizette Irizarry on 9/22/2009. (Irizarry, Dora)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Assitalia Le Assicurazioni D'italia S.p.A. et al v. Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?