Lichtenstein v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. et al
Plaintiff: |
Joseph Lichtenstein |
Defendant: |
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co., Susan Rentz and Sheila Sacco |
Case Number: |
1:2007cv01680 |
Filed: |
April 23, 2007 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Office: |
Brooklyn Office |
County: |
Kings |
Presiding Judge: |
Lois Bloom |
Presiding Judge: |
Dora Lizette Irizarry |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Statutory Actions |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 8, 2010 |
Filing
56
ORDER: By letter 55 dated 3/3/2010, defendants inform the Court that plaintiff has failed to execute and return releases for medical records, social security administration records, tax records, and employment records. Plaintiff has also failed to respond to defendants' interrogatories, or to a notice for his deposition, which is scheduled to be held on 3/10/2010. Defendants request that the Court dismiss plaintiff's complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(f) and 37(b)(2)(A)(v). De fendants' 55 request is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to respond to defendants' interrogatories, sign all of the above-mentioned releases, and return his responses and the executed releases to defendants 9; counsel by 3/23/2010. If plaintiff fails to comply with this Order by March 23, 2010, the Court will recommend that his case should be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v). Assuming that plaintiff timely complies and return s the responses and releases, defendants shall notice plaintiff's deposition and the Court will order plaintiff to appear for his deposition on the selected date. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom, on 3/8/2010) C/mailed. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa)
|
January 13, 2010 |
Filing
54
ORDER, On 12/15/09, the Second Circuit dismissed pltff's 8/11/09 interlocutory appeals in these cases. The Court therefore lifts the previously imposed stay and sets 4/26/10 as the new deadline for the parties to complete all discovery. Since 4/ 26/10 is the deadline for the completion of all discovery, requests to the opposing party must be serve at least 30 days before that deadline. The parties may conduct depositions upon oral examination pursuant to FRCP 30. If defts intend to file a motion for summary judgment, defts' counsel shall write to Judge Irizarry by 5/24/10 to request a pre-motion conference. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom on 1/11/2010) c/m (Galeano, Sonia)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?