Saunders v. NYC Department of Education
Plaintiff: Jennifer Saunders
Defendant: NYC Department of Education
Case Number: 1:2007cv02725
Filed: July 3, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Lois Bloom
Presiding Judge: Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 127 OPINION AND ORDER granting 116 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 117 Motion to Dismiss. The DOE dfts' motion for reconsideration of the July 15, 2010 order is granted; the branches of the DOE dfts' separate motion seeking "clarification" of the July 15, 2010 order and dismissal of the remaining claims against Dennis and Antinez are denied; and plff's motion is denied. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/20/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)
July 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 115 OPINION AND ORDER denying 87 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; granting in part and denying in part 90 Motion to Dismiss; denying 102 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/15/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)
January 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 43 Motion to Dismiss. The branch of Lawson's motion seeking to dismiss the amended complaint against him as barred by the doctrine of absolute immunity is granted and the amended complaint is dismissed in its entirety, with prej udice, as against Lawson. In addition, the following claims are dismissed sua sponte as frivolous: (1) plff's due process claims (fifth and eighth claims for relief) against all defendants, except Dennis, Anthinez and the DOE based upon the fail ure to pay plaintiff from May through August 2008; (2) plaintiff's ADEA, Title VII and FLSA claims (first, second and fourth claims for relief, respectively) against all defendants except the DOE; (3) plff's NYSHRL and NYCHRL claims (sixth and seventh claims for relief) against the UFT dfts; and (4) all claims against Rivera and Mastramauro, and the amended complaint is dismissed in its entirety as against those dfts. SO ORDERED. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 1/19/2010. (Brienza, Lauren)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saunders v. NYC Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer Saunders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NYC Department of Education
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?