Magi XXI, Inc. v. Ufficio Vendita Pubblicazioni E et al
| Magi XXI, Inc. |
| Ufficio Vendita Pubblicazioni E, Riproduzioni Dei Musei Vaticani, Biblioteca Apostolica Vaticana, Gerald P. Colapinto, Second Renaissance, LLC and John Does Nos. 1 through 50 |
| 1:2007cv02898 |
| July 17, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Joan M. Azrack |
| Sandra L. Townes |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
112
ORDER granting 92 and terminating as moot 104 Motion to Dismiss: granting motion to vacate order compelling arbitration 82 , 100 : For the reasons set forth in the attache Memorandum and Order, the Vatican States motion to dismiss all claims against it for improper venue based on the forum selection clauses (Doc. No. 92) is GRANTED. The Court need not decide the Vatican States motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction (Doc. No. 104). The joint motion submitted by plaint iff, defendant SRLLC, and defendant Colapinto to vacate this Courts August 21, 2008 Order compelling arbitration (Doc. Nos. 82, 100) is also GRANTED. The claims as between those parties will proceed in this Court. This case is recommitted to the assigned Magistrate Judge for all pre-trial matters.. Ordered by Judge Roslynn R. Mauskopf on 8/24/2011. (Mauskopf, Roslynn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
