Line v. Phoenix Agro-Industrial Corporation

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Eastern District Line v. Phoenix Agro-Industrial Corporation

Line v. Phoenix Agro-Industrial Corporation

Plaintiff:	Maersk Line
Defendant:	Phoenix Agro-Industrial Corporation
Case Number:	1:2007cv03169
Filed:	August 1, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office:	Brooklyn Office
County:	Kings
Presiding Judge:	Joan M. Azrack
Presiding Judge:	Sandra J. Feuerstein
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Marine
Cause of Action:	46 U.S.C. § 741 Shipping
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 27, 2009	Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations, 22 Motion for Default Judgment, filed by Maersk Line. Plaintiff's motion is granted to the extent that plaintiff is awarded liquidated damages on breach of shipping contract claims against defendant in the amount of twenty-five thousand six hundred thirty-eight dollars and seventy-five cents ($25,638.75), plus pre-judgment interest at a rate of three percent (3%) for the period from February 6, 2007 t hrough January 23, 2009, for a total amount of twenty-seven thousand one hundred fifteen dollars and fifty-six cents ($27,113.56), and that defendant's counterclaim is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, and the motion is other wise denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in accordance with this Order and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/27/2009. (Mierzejewski, Elizabeth)
April 29, 2009	Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 MOTION for Default Judgment: for the reasons discussed in the attached R&R, I respectfully recommend that plaintiff's motion for default judgment be granted, that a final default judgment of $27,113.56 be entered against defendant, and that defendant's counterclaim be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to serve a copy of this R&R on defendant and to promptly file proof of service by ECF. Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Joan M. Azrack on 4/29/2009. (Bhatt, Tina) Modified on 4/29/2009 (Bhatt, Tina).

Date Filed

Document Text

May 27, 2009

Filing 26 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 24 Report and Recommendations, 22 Motion for Default Judgment, filed by Maersk Line. Plaintiff's motion is granted to the extent that plaintiff is awarded liquidated damages on breach of shipping contract claims against defendant in the amount of twenty-five thousand six hundred thirty-eight dollars and seventy-five cents ($25,638.75), plus pre-judgment interest at a rate of three percent (3%) for the period from February 6, 2007 t hrough January 23, 2009, for a total amount of twenty-seven thousand one hundred fifteen dollars and fifty-six cents ($27,113.56), and that defendant's counterclaim is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, and the motion is other wise denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff in accordance with this Order and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 5/27/2009. (Mierzejewski, Elizabeth)

April 29, 2009

Filing 24 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 22 MOTION for Default Judgment: for the reasons discussed in the attached R&R, I respectfully recommend that plaintiff's motion for default judgment be granted, that a final default judgment of $27,113.56 be entered against defendant, and that defendant's counterclaim be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to serve a copy of this R&R on defendant and to promptly file proof of service by ECF. Objections to R&R due by 5/18/2009. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Joan M. Azrack on 4/29/2009. (Bhatt, Tina) Modified on 4/29/2009 (Bhatt, Tina).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Line v. Phoenix Agro-Industrial Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maersk Line
Represented By:	Albert J. Avallone
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Phoenix Agro-Industrial Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?