Star Mark Management, Inc. et al v. Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd.
Plaintiff: Star Mark Management, Inc., Great Mark Corporation and Jimmy Zhan
Defendant: Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2007cv03208
Filed: August 3, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Office: Brooklyn Office
County: Queens
Presiding Judge: Joseph F. Bianco
Presiding Judge: Steven M. Gold
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER denying 53 Motion for Reconsideration. For the reasons set forth in the attached memorandum and order, defendants motion for reconsideration of this courts September 30, 2010 Order is denied in its entirety. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment in accordance with the September 30 Order and to close this case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 11/23/2010. (Ginns, Laura)
September 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER granting in part 33 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting in part 46 Report and Recommendations. For the reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum and Order, Chief Magistrate Judge Gold's well-reasoned and thorough Report and Recommen dation is adopted in all respects and the parties' objections are denied, with the exception that, based upon the showing of financial hardship by plaintiffs and their attorney, the total sanctions award is reduced to $10,000, comprised of $9,939.61 in attorneys' fees and $60.39 in costs, and no pre-judgment interest is awarded. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment in accordance with this order and to close the case. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/30/2010. (Ginns, Laura)
September 8, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting 10 Motion for Sanctions. Ordered by Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto on 9/8/2009. As set forth in the attached memorandum and order, defendant's motion for sanctions and motion to dismiss are granted. (McCampbell, Erin)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Star Mark Management, Inc. et al v. Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Star Mark Management, Inc.
Represented By: Bing Li
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Great Mark Corporation
Represented By: Bing Li
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy Zhan
Represented By: Bing Li
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Koon Chun Hing Kee Soy & Sauce Factory, Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?