Lozowsky v. Planet Automall, Inc. et al
| Michael Lozowsky |
| Planet Automall, Inc. and M&T Bank Corporation |
| 1:2007cv03684 |
| August 31, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Brooklyn Office |
| Kings |
| Frederic Block |
| Roanne L. Mann |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM, ORDER & JUDGMENT. For the reasons stated in the attached opinion, the Clerk of the Court is directed to dismiss plaintiff Lozowsky's complaint, and to enter judgment in favor of M&T Bank on its counterclaim in the amount of $59,493.52, plus $8,963.37 in prejudgment interest and post-judgment interest calculated in accordance with Section 1916(a), Title 28, United States Code. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 7/29/2009. (Mann, Roanne)
|
|
Filing
35
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. For the reasons stated in the attached Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, this Court directs that the complaint be dismissed and that judgment be entered in favor of M&T Bank on its counterclaim, in an amount to be determined following further submissions from the parties: By 7/9/09, M&T Bank is directed to submit an updated statement of amounts owed, including the basis for those amounts. Plaintiff's response, if any, shall be filed by 7/17/09. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann on 6/29/2009. (Mann, Roanne)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
